If you watched Hell on Wheels last night you probably saw The Walking Dead preview of the newest episode. What we saw basically was Daryl falling off his horse and falling down rocks and being shot but his own arrow, and he looks like he's bleeding pretty badly. And with the preview of the next episode after this last one [Cherokee Rose] We see his crazy brother's face, Honestly i believe it's not him at all, I bet it's just Daryl losing to much blood and seeing his brother, maybe because he is he's older brother probably i don't know really, what are YOUR thoughts about this next episode to happen?
sounds rather dubiousEdit
", although in an interview with Robert Kirkman, he said he was going to put him in the comic. " can we please have a source? 22:56, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
At the bottom of the trivia section it refers to Daryl angel wing vest. Those are a symbol of the Hell's Angels, and hardly a metaphor for kindness in the show.
Killed victims Edit
I think it's a bit misleading to put that Dale was killed before reanimation. Killing someone before reanimation would mean that you were destroying the brain of their already dead body, but Dale wasn't already dead. 22.214.171.124 15:38, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
we have already established that darly killed dale out of mercy, it has been but on dale's page and daryl's page, before reanimation means either before they die and reanimate or as they're dead so they dont reanimated - BanishU 15:41, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
So why don't I argue that Rick killed Tony and Dave before reanimation? Their deaths are no different to Dale's, the only difference is that Dale had a big injury that was considerably shortening his life. It would be daft to put it like this:
Killed victims: Dale (before death)
But that's effectively what you're doing. 126.96.36.199 15:48, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
then instead of doing it like this
- Dale Horvath (Mercy Killing) do Dale Horvath (Out Of Mercy), saying mercy killing makes it sound rough - BanishU 15:53, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
he is cool
- I agree that something doesn't feel right here. Having just "before reanimation" after Dale makes it look like Daryl killed Dale after he was dead ONLY, and NOT while he was living, like Carl did with Lori. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 23:29, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
BanishU why did you undo my edit? Back in April you agreed with me but now you keep changing it back to the illogical before reanimation rubbish. Why? At least give me a reason why you don't agree any more. 188.8.131.52 18:06, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
Daryl's bad influenceEdit
Daryl's bad attitude is probably due in part to his older brother (ans by extention, father) Daryl is probably a nice bloke but he is badly influenced by his older brother. His older brother can see that Daryl is superior and is therefore jealous, and so puts Daryl down and make Daryl feel like he needs his brother. With his older brother missing, Daryl slowly started to revert to his normal self which is why he becomes much nicer until he hallucinates about his brother peer pressuring him again.
Wiki editors pls...Edit
- sigh* How do ai explain simple mathematics.....y'all are saying that you are confused because its stated that Daryl kept 4 bolts at the beginning yet you could only see 3 in his quiver. Okay children, lesson time: We have a crowssbow holding ONE bolt, and we have a quiver holding THREE bolts...what does that add up to? Well done, retards.
"Crush" tag for Carol Edit
Norman Reedus himself said that Daryl won't be having a romance any time in the future, so it needs to STOP being put in the 'relations' section!!
This is no longer true as Norman Reedus told Entertainment Weekly that he hopes it happens, and that he hopes it's "really awkward" and that he hopes she "makes the first move." Not sure if this means we should rethink the crush tag, but I'm thinking not until we see actual evidence in the show.
It should also be noted that Melissa McBride has said that Carol loves Daryl and in a not mother/son type of way. Again, this is left up to interpretation. But the idea that the actors are against this romance are not accurate or true (anymore). Miss Anonymous hp (talk) 04:52, March 28, 2013 (UTC)
for all these characters in which an age is unknown, why don't we just do something like "30s/40s" for Daryl, for example. And use "40s/50s" for Merle, etc? No need for "early", "late" or "mid" anyway...it's just a rough estimate. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 10:09, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
Daryl Kill count Edit
So, does ANYONE have a official COUNT od Daryl Dixon kills - Victims = walkers.. Im looking for his total.. and how bad he is compared to some of the other characters
184.108.40.206 17:48, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
An exact count of the number of walkers Daryl has killed? Ah, that's impossible since quite a few of them have happened off screen. (Take the scene at the farm or the prison when we end up cutting away from him and finding him again a few minutes later. Not to mention all the walkers killed over the winter.) If you're asking for human deaths, at this point, there are only 3 confirmed deaths by his hand. Dale (out of mercy) and two Woodbary guards. Miss Anonymous hp (talk) 10:32, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
You can't get an exact count of all the walkers killed, but you can get a count of the onscreen and mentioned walker kills. Personally, I like te idea of us putting, on each of the survivor pages, the number of walkers we know they have killed. I've suggested this idea several times, but I don't think it's had much interest. 220.127.116.11 10:42, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
That would be a very very difficult task, and I dont think an admin would approve anyway,
We don't put the amount of Walkers people have killed unless they've killed very few, if someone's killed many walkers, such as Daryl, we just put "Numerous counts of zombies"
Indeed we do, but it's not particularly informative, is it? If I were to tell you that I was "numerous counts of years old", you most likely wouldn't have a hope in hell of guessing how old I am. An exact count of walkers killed would be interesting for the character pages. I'm not going to put this idea into action though, because I know the admins would disapprove for no reason. 18.104.22.168 19:36, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
Actually, it's because an accurate count would be impossible- for all we know, he's killed 500 walkers in the time between the farm and the prison. Likewise for the rest- Beth probably killed 2000 for all we know, and Carol 3000. Alockwood1 (talk) 20:29, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
A number of the least amount of walkers they could have killed is better than the incredibly vague claim that they have killed "numerous counts". Besides, Gargulio could have killed 2000 walkers, but everyone seems to be happy with the fact that his list says "at least one zombie". 22.214.171.124 20:51, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
Why am I not surprised this discussion is on Daryl's talk page...and yeah, we know that any visibly tough person (Rick, Tyreese, T-Dog, etc.) have killed many zombies, but weaker people like Sophia have definitely not killed that many. So that's what we really go by. Shellturtleguy (talk) 21:36, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
That isn't true shell. Stokes looks tough but has never killed a walker. While mikey or sohia possibly has. Same applies to the showTeam Schrute 21:40, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
Mikey doesn't have a Killed Victims section at all :P. And you're right, that's my bad, I wasn't thinking that straight when typing that. But some of the pages seem to use inference when it comes to the amount of zombies killed, if you understand what I'm saying. Shellturtleguy (talk) 23:19, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
Daryl's Hunting Knife Edit
Does anyone know what make of hunting knife Daryl keeps as his backup weapon?
Forever Alone: Not neededEdit
On part of his trivia, the coding was messed up. It's supposed to be a reference, but it got messed up.
AND, For the trivia section Daryl also called Milton "sunshine". I don't know if we should add that though. Anyways, an Admin has to fix these issues. --JuneCat 23:16, March 15, 2013 (UTC)